Is the future.

Peter, At the other side of the EECV terminal is an extensive loading facility for inland barges. In fact all cargo arriving at EECV is transshipped, either by barge and a little by train.So while your explanation might be valid in case most of the cargo would stay in Rotterdam, in this case I don't think it is correct.

Thanks sir(s)..my opinion there are not only one receiver of cgo.so term different also

It must be transshipment cargo. Transhipment by inland cargo vessel (as seen alongside) going up-rhine for further processing. It´s the most economical way to handle this cargo. Regards Peter

Husni, you are touching on something that puzzles me too. Perhaps using the shore cranes is more expensive. EECV often uses floating cranes also for the large ore carriers, and I don't think it is a matter of time pressure but it must be something else.

Anyone can help me some information, why using one floating crane for cgo ops since another shot by shore cranes? is she two dich ports in rotterdam?

Another shot by two gangs disch, this oic only using floating crane for cape size?

Like

It's a design by Imabari Shipbuilding called an Aero-Citadel. :)
Cody

An interesting superstructure.